Comments on: Tamara Hoover Pedo Art Teacher

By: james

james — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:35:54 +0000

I wish I went to this school when I went to school as it sounds like students have access to Pornographic Material at school.

By: Mike Kirby

Mike Kirby — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:05:13 +0000

“Tamara Hoover Pedo Art Teacher”? If I were Hoover, I’d sue the author of this blog for libel. Is this what you do, label anyone who does something you don’t like a “pedo”, even if they’ve never committed or even been accused of a pedophile act?? And since when does “topless”=”pornography”? Classical statues are often topless, as are fine art photographs.

By: Hugo

Hugo — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:24:04 +0000

I guess teachers aren’t allowed to be sexual beings in their private lives. Unlike the rest of us, teachers must not have sex lives, or else their smut might rub off on the students.

You could make the argument that it’s not appropriate for teachers because they are in positions of authority, but that just reinforces the hypocritical view that only “whores” have sex, and good women keep their legs crossed.

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:54:57 +0000

What is the “pedo” issue in this case? No charges pressed? How “guilty” is she if she receives $14k settlement from the school. This case belongs rather on a “excessively puritan scheel management blog then on a pedo teacher blog.
But that may be my liberal view.